Talk:Malocclusion

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ajd in topic Overly technical

Causes

edit

Lots of "citation needed." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.87.138 (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Buck teeth?

edit

Buck teeth redirects here but the article doesn't explain what it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) 02:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Open bite malocclusion

edit

I moved the following suggestion to here, because I currently don't find any article titled Open bite malocclusion. Also, this is a quite sizable article with a lot of referenced text. If anything, I think a wp:move proposal would be more appropriate than to delete. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

{{Proposed deletion/dated |concern = I've created a new Wikipedia page called Open Bite Malocclusion. The word open bite is a slang term and should properly be addressed as Open Bite Malocclusion. In addition, this article was previously redirected to the article "Malocclusion" which did not have much information about open bite. Thus I request the reviewer to check out the new page Open Bite Malocclusion and allow that page to be the primary article for open bite and delete this page. |timestamp = 20170411182750}}
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malocclusion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Overly technical

edit

A lot of this article seems overly technical, especially in the "Classification" section. For example, Underbite redirects here, but I don't think an average reader would be able to learn and understand what an underbite is from this article—the only definition given is that an underbite is when "the upper molars are placed not in the mesiobuccal groove but posteriorly to it"; I don't think most readers know what the mesiobuccal groove is (and it's not defined or linked!), and not everyone even knows what "posteriorly" means! AJD (talk) 15:44, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply