Talk:Malt Shovel (sculpture)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Chipmunkdavis in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Malt Shovel (sculpture) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Chipmunkdavis (talk) 17:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a 9-metre tall (30 ft) Malt Shovel in Burton upon Trent, might actually be a scoop? "stainless steel, 9m high" from: Noszlopy, George Thomas; Waterhouse, Fiona (2005). Public Sculpture of Staffordshire and the Black Country. Liverpool University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-85323-989-5. and "The malt shovel, which dominates the corner of New Street and High Street has been a landmark in the town for almost 20 years ... Mr McPherson explained that the shovels that were used in the breweries were completely flat and the sculpture had raised sides which made it look like a scoop." from: Moody, Jenny (8 February 2020). "Why controversial Burton sculpture has divided opinion for 20 years". DerbyshireLive. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
- ALT1:... that a 9-metre tall (30 ft) tall stainless steel Malt Shovel stands on a street corner in Burton upon Trent? Source per ALT0
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 10:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC).
- Reviewing
- Article is new enough, well written, neutral and supported by 2 inline citations.
- Long enough.
- Hooks are short enough, correctly formatted and supported by inline citation.
- No copyvio issue on Earwig.
- QPQ done.
- Good to go. Papamac (talk) 10:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)