Talk:Malta at the 2008 Summer Paralympics
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Usernameunique in topic GA Review
Malta at the 2008 Summer Paralympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 3, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Malta at the 2008 Summer Paralympics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Malta at the 2008 Summer Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 01:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Lead
having qualified by receiving accreditation
— This basically says "he qualified by qualifying". How did he actually qualify?- Rewritten MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- This now reads "having qualified by participating at the 2008 British Open Athletics Championships." Was participation, alone, in these championships sufficient to qualify? Or did he need to do sufficiently well in these championships to qualify for the Paralympics? --Usernameunique (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Just by participating MWright96 (talk) 05:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- That doesn't make much sense, and it doesn't seem to be what the source says: "Recently he took part in a competition abroad, at the British Open Championships for competitors falling under his own disablement category, where he received accreditation to take part in these forthcoming Paralymics." I've adjusted the wording in the article accordingly. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Just by participating MWright96 (talk) 05:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- This now reads "having qualified by participating at the 2008 British Open Athletics Championships." Was participation, alone, in these championships sufficient to qualify? Or did he need to do sufficiently well in these championships to qualify for the Paralympics? --Usernameunique (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Rewritten MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
11th overall in the competition during the heat stages.
— I would also note the specific reason for not qualifying (finished 5th in heat; only top 4 advanced)- Added MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Added mention of where in his heat Flores finished MWright96 (talk) 06:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Added MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Background
Malta debuted in the Paralympic movement
— Is "movement" really correct here? "Paralympic Games"?- Changed MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Worth mentioning that the 1960 Summer Paralympics were the first official Paralympic Games?
Excepting the period between 1988 and 2004
— Based on the infobox, looks like they didn't participate in 1976 either.
Athletics
- Link clubbed foot to clubfoot?
- T64 links to T44.
- Can you give a description of what T44 (or T64) is?
is currently
— What about in 2008?- Clarified MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- If Flores was categorized as T64, why did he participate in the T44 event?
- Changed MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Anything to link 2008 British Open Athletics Championships to?
- What does "the necessary accreditation" entail?
- Removed MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- How many heats were there?
since he did not finish in the top four of his individual heat
— Did the top four of six automatically advance? How far from #4 was he?
Overall
- Anything about the closing ceremony to add?
- The Reference for the closing ceremony has not been archived MWright96 (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Have made changes based on the points raised above. Can you take another look? MWright96 (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Have replied to the various comments made above MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Any updates of this review? MWright96 (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay on this, MWright96. One question above. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- MWright96, responded above. Passing now. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay on this, MWright96. One question above. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Any updates of this review? MWright96 (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Have replied to the various comments made above MWright96 (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)