Talk:Mamihlapinatapai
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Yaghan website
editI have a website I've been building up regarding Yaghan culture. I've used MediaWiki to let non-techie users add/review content.
Its temporary URL is http://yaghan.no-ip.org, and it's up only between 9AM and 7PM Chilean Time.
Under the contents section in the navigation bar is the site itself. I haven't even changed the look yet, so any additions or comments would be greatly appreciated.
Since this is a non-profit project, I took some content directly from Wikipedia and added some placeholders for some of the topics that the site must hold.
Any contributions would be greatly appreciated.
The actual wording is not romantic
editAs of August 20, 2019 the article says "a look shared by two people, each wishing that the other would initiate something that they both desire but which neither wants to begin." However the reference says "looking at each other hoping that either will offer to do something which both parties desire but are unwilling to do". The meaning is not supposed to be romantic. Piaractus (talk) 22:43, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Mutual Indecision
editIsn't this describing nothing more than a state of mutual indecision, and as such is not in need of a uniquely descriptive term at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.151.210.84 (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The article satisfies Wikipedia's notability guideline, if that's what you're asking. Otherwise, take it up with The Guinness Book of World Records; this talk page isn't a forum for discussion of the topic itself. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 17:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)