Talk:Mammillaria

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SebastianHelm in topic Why was the name changed from Cactus?

Here's a good starting point: Mammillaria: All about the Mammillaria Cactus Genus --buckwad 18:30, 2005 Jan 10 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mammillaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why was the name changed from Cactus?

edit

Since the first species was described as Cactus mammillaris already by Carl Linnaeus, shouldn't that name have preference? ◅ Sebastian 18:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

See Cactus#Taxonomy and classification; in summary, the name "cactus" had become so confused that the 1905 Vienna botanical congress rejected Cactus as genus name, and conserved Mammillaria. This should be mentioned in this article, I think. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've now added a bit to the Taxonomy section. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Peter, for your explanation, the link, and your addition. Those are two interesting sections. At first I suspected that there'd be much of an overlap, but I couldn't find any. My only gripe is your use of “tangible” in the context of a cactus. Ouch! ;-) ◅ Sebastian 21:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply