 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 May 2008. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
notability
editIt is currently not clear whether this series is notable enough for Wikipedia, since no secondary sources are cited. See also Wikipedia:Notability (films) for inclusion criteria. Generally speaking, a film or series is notable if it is has been covered in independent reliable sources. These could be books, television documentaries, full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers, or the like. Advertisements, program schedules, or press releases would however not count towards notability. Also, the existence of an IMDB entry is often considered only "trivial coverage".
The sources may, but need not, be available online; it is however important that they are explicitly cited. Please add such sources to the article.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have added links from two independent sources that verify the show's two-season run on American TV and its unique content. Thus, I am removing the tag requesting it be considered for deletion. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- E, I have put it up at AfD. THe sources you added are not what I would call reliable sources. But I am willing to be convinced otherwise, should consensus say that it is notable. Pastordavid (talk) 16:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- No prob. Hate to contradict you, but I feel this show meets the notability barrier. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- E, I have put it up at AfD. THe sources you added are not what I would call reliable sources. But I am willing to be convinced otherwise, should consensus say that it is notable. Pastordavid (talk) 16:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)