Talk:Manchester North West (UK Parliament constituency)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gordon Hewart
editIs GH (losing candidate 1912) Gordon Hewart, 1st Viscount Hewart? Right party (Liberal), the timing would fit (the Viscount didn't enter parliament until 1913). Mr Stephen 23:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Answer: Britannica says yes, see http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9040323 Mr Stephen 19:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Manchester North West (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060520143104/http://www.manchester.gov.uk/elections/archive/gen1900.htm to http://www.manchester.gov.uk/elections/archive/gen1900.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060520143047/http://www.manchester.gov.uk/elections/archive/gen1945.htm to http://www.manchester.gov.uk/elections/archive/gen1945.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040828173431/http://www.modjourn.brown.edu/mjp/NAVall/Nav2/NAV0226.pdf to http://www.modjourn.brown.edu/mjp/navall/nav2/NAV0226.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
General election 1914/15 - John Simon?
editIs there a source for the claim that John Simon, 1st Viscount Simon had been selected to contest the seat for the Liberal Party at election that was expected to take place in 1914 or 1915 (but did not due to the Great War)? I am not saying it is wrong, but I am a little suspicious. It is not mentioned in his article and, while Simon did have strong Manchester connections, in 1914 he was a senior member of the Liberal Government with a decent majority in his Walthamstow seat so it would be a little odd for him to be trying to win back a seat for his party (although given Bonar Law had done almost the exact same thing in 1910 it is not beyond the realms of possibility). If the reference is right and it is John Simon, is definitely the same John Simon as Liberal minister. Equally I wonder if is possible that someone is confusing John Simon and the then prominent Manchester Liberal Ernest Simon? Dunarc (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- It has been cleared up at Talk:John Simon, 1st Viscount Simon that this is correct. Dunarc (talk) 15:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- I've posted some comments about the nature of the NW Manchester seat on Sir John Simon's talk page, and won't annoy everyone by repeating myself. However, it should be noted that, according to Law's 1999 biographer RJQ Adams, the tale that Bonar Law challenged Churchill to a fight in Dec 1910 is not confirmed by pre-1950s evidence. That doesn't mean that it's untrue, just that it needs to be treated with caution.Paulturtle (talk) 16:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)