Talk:Manhattan Declaration
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jim.henderson in topic So where's the sources
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
About the AfD
editIt is ridiculous to tag this page for deletion simply because one does not agree with it. It should be cleaned up and expanded, not deleted. MikeRay (talk) 17:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, it seems some are pretty quick on the draw here. You'll find other comments here and I suppose further discussion on deletion of this article would/should take place there - already several comments and this page has been up less than a day. Wow. Lexlex (talk) 02:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
So where's the sources
editDespite people yelling when this article was nominated for deletion it's been 6 months now and the article still does not establish notability with 2 self published sources, and one source to The Register who could perhaps be a RS for computer related stuff , but not for science or climate change. A quick Google doesn't find anything more useful. Unless this article is improved soon, I will probably bring it to AFD again. Nil Einne (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not following your logic here. You might make it a stub, but deleting a page merely because it hasn't been expanded is a pretty drastic solution and not in keeping with policy. Why don't you expand it? Lexlex (talk) 20:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Wouldn't a merger be more to the point anyway? Jim.henderson (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)