This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
A couple of years ago @Britishfinance: boldly merged Asessippi Ski Area here. While I'm a fan of bold merges (I've done several myself), I'm wondering if the ski area would make more sense at Rural Municipality of Riding Mountain West. Manitoba Escarpment is a geology landform type article and the RM is more of a geography type article. I'm not going to boldly move it over; I want to create discussion on this (maybe I'm wrong). Thoughts? Masterhatch (talk) 12:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Looking through the uses of{{Infobox ski area}}, the vast majority are used in standalone articles, which would argue for undoing the splitmerge and leaving a stub. I did find Cairn Gorm, which is an article about both a mountain and a ski area. If we follow that precedent, then it would make sense to keep the ski area merged here, because this is the "mountain" that the ski area is on. I haven't seen any uses of the infobox in an article about a town, although I haven't looked carefully through all 807 transclusions. — hike395 (talk) 04:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
I can count the number of edits that I've made on active ski hills on hand as that's not an area I'm usually interested in. After I made that post, I did a little more looking around and saw it was common to have stubs for ski hills, just like it's common to have stubs for airports (List of airports in Saskatchewan & List of airports in Manitoba). No one's talking about merging those, nor should they (IMHO). You suggested splitting the article back up. I agree that that might be the right course to take. Masterhatch (talk) 10:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done --- I also found separate articles for Mount Agassiz Ski Resort and Thunderhill Ski Area, both on the Escarpment. So it doesn't make much sense for Asessippi to be merged in. — hike395 (talk) 15:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)