Talk:Manly Wade Wellman

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2603:9001:4500:1C09:6540:AD88:DF84:1537 in topic Substantial logical inconsistencies

"Silver" John

edit

I have read all the "John" stories, and Wellman never refered to the character as "Silver John". This was a label dreamed up by his later publishers, after most of the "John" stories had already been written and published. I changed the intro to reflect this.

Also, a "Silver John" story appears in the December 1951 issue of F&SF, available on Internet Archive. So putting him in the 1960s section is inaccurate. 100.15.127.199 (talk) 02:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Manly Wade Wellman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manly Wade Wellman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Substantial logical inconsistencies

edit

The article includes a quote from Alfred Bester claiming that Wellman had a withered hand or arm. No other mention of this is made anywhere else in the article; indeed, Wellman is described in multiple places as an American football star, farmer, cowboy, laborer, soldier and bouncer, all occupations requiring two functioning hands. The article requires a statement along the lines of “despite his physical handicap, he was able to make a living” in these roles, and information about the cause and treatment of the underlying issue.

Near the end of the article, is it claimed that his health deteriorated due to “the onset of gangrene in his legs following a double amputation”; surely what was meant was “the onset of gangrene in his legs requiring a double amputation”. If gangrene occurred after amputation, (1) he had the basis for a lawsuit that he would have won, and (2) the article requires information about the reason for the amputation since by inference it wasn’t due to gangrene but to some other injury or illness. The cited source is not immediately verifiable as I have no local access to Locus. 2603:9001:4500:1C09:6540:AD88:DF84:1537 (talk) 14:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply