Talk:Mantainer Ardath
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge of Norton Snoopy into Mantainer Ardath
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Norton Snoopy page were merged into Mantainer Ardath on 2 November 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
It is requested that an image or photograph of Mantainer Ardath be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Proposed merge of Norton Snoopy into Mantainer Ardath
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To merge Norton Snoopy into Mantainer Ardath on the grounds of short text and context. Klbrain (talk) 10:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Not enough to support notability for this one, could be one or two lines in the Ardath article though Fram (talk) 09:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Fram,
- I created both articles. I wonder if they could be kept separate, mainly due to human-powered airships being quite rare, and the Snoopy being special, due to that. I suspect Snoopy garnered some media coverage at the time (it was built as a promotional device for the Ardath). My own, limited, searches though have yet to locate any. :-( However, if the Snoopy retains its own page, then its very existence may help to elicit such material, and so help to bolster the article.
- Kind regards, Paul
- Aerohydro (talk) 06:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, sorry. Unless or until the sources are found, it shouldn't stay as a separate article: we don't keep articles in the hope that sources will turn up one day. Fram (talk) 08:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- The main thing with aircraft articles is that we generally insist on only one Specifications section per article. At present there is not enough data on Snoopy to be worth having one, and what little else is in there can easily be merged across and a redirect left behind. As, when and if sufficient data on Snoopy is forthcoming, then its article can always be resurrected. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)