Talk:Manusmriti
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manusmriti article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Major removal of scholarly sources and sourced content with allegations of OR /undue /repetition /quotes
editCapitals00: This, this and this edit summary (or lack thereof) are difficult to understand, misrepresent the sourced content/sources you removed. If you have specific concerns, please explain with evidence, and then let us discuss them one by one. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
No mention of Brahministic exploitation of Indian masses by using Manusmriti as a tool?
editWhere is it? Why is it not being mentioned in the topic? 122.162.151.69 (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Thus spake... or didn't
editThe part on Nietzcshcschshe is hilarious. It literally goes from one statement to its contradiction. And back...
First, he praises it and the caste system. In the next sentence, he "does not advocate a caste system, states David Conway, but endorses the political exclusion conveyed in the Manu text". He didn't kill him, he only ended his life functions. To say that kind of idiocy is just sad, even for an angsty, teenage Nietzschsctzsche-romanticizing troglodyte, not to mention an "academic philosopher who has written several books on philosophy and politics".
Then we are again (rightly) reminded that "Nietzsche considered Manu's social order as far from perfect, but considers the general idea of a caste system to be natural and right".
But, hold on! There's another slope on this roller coaster. Mr. Kauffman is now reminding us that Friedrich "denounces the way in which the 'Law of Manu' dealt with the outcastes, saying that there is nothing that outrages our feelings more" and "that the concept of pure blood is the opposite of a harmless concept" completely ignoring the fact that Mustache-man doesn't really care about "our feelings" nor the harmfulness of the concept. He just states the fact. He celebrates it. How much of a rationalizing infant one has to be and conclude this after reading pages 48-49 of The twilight of the idols...
But hey, they're reliable sources, so there you go. 109.165.140.94 (talk) 12:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
in manuscripts, no kidding?
edit- In ancient India, the sages often wrote their ideas on how society should run in the manuscripts.
How else would they write them? Can this sentence be made less trivial? Perhaps something like: The Dharmaśāstras are writings by ancient Indian sages on how society should run. —Tamfang (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Manusmriti
edit"Manusmriti" is an ancient Sanskrit term, but it is newer to the West. 49.224.197.129 (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)