Talk:Maple Leaf Pro Wrestling

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maple Leaf Wrestling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141007014614/http://www.garywill.com/toronto/ to http://www.garywill.com/toronto/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Spin-off

Spun-off history and information on the original Maple Leaf Wrestling into its own article to avoid confusion.

I'd also suggest verifying the information on that page matches that of these sources:

• Toronto Wrestling History
• Maple Leaf Wrestling - Pictorial & History
• Wrestling-Titles.com: Maple Leaf Wrestling
• Maple Leaf Wrestling retrospective

Thecleanerand (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Hell. Fucking. No. This is tantamount to a cut-and-paste page move. Since there's no direct connection between the two promotions, the current promotion should have been created as a new article, not piggybacked onto an established article in the hopes that it would receive greater exposure. SeosiWrestling, you created this mess. Are you going to fix this or are you going to force others to fix it for you? RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 19:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

How about hello, hi, how are you? You can just say I made a mistake and I can fix it. Although, it's clear that it's related to the original Maple Leaf Wrestling, as you can read it on their press release back on August 8th. @RadioKAOS. SeosiWrestling (talk) 12:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Clearly, this is an issue between you and SeosiWrestling, so I'll leave it up to you two.

I agree wholeheartedly that the new promotion should have been given its own page; which is why I essentially separated "Maple Leaf Wrestling" from "Maple Leaf Pro Wrestling". If there's a problem with that, you can move the content on the "History of Maple Leaf Wrestling" page back to the original Maple Leaf Wrestling page; since it's essentially the same page minus the Revival section. Thecleanerand (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Response to removal of valid maintenance tags

@Thecleanerand: In again removing the unreferenced section tags, you wrote: There were NO {{citation needed}} tags on this page before I started editing. Don't lecture ME on citations and sources because I'M THE ONLY ONE ON THIS WEBSITE WHO ACTUALLY ENFORCES THAT RULE! Practice what you preach instead of making false acquisitions!.

I have two points in response:

1. Please assume good faith and do not make personal attacks. I am not making an "accusation" against you. We use maintenance templates on Wikipedia to categorize articles that need more work. Editors then look in those categories and help when they can. (Additionally, I do practice what I preach. When I add content to Wikipedia, I make sure to add a citation. Feel free to have a look at my contributions.)
2. The {{urs}} template is used to point out that there are no inline citations in a section. There are, in fact, no inline citations in those sections. References listed underneath the {{reflist}} at the end of the article are not inline citations. Per WP:WNTRMT, maintenance templates should not be removed if the problem is still in the article.

I hope you will restore the templates.

Regarding the edits I made to the section headings, please review MOS:LAYOUT. There should not be one level 2 heading for all of the content and then level 3 and 4 headings. That is not a proper way to structure a Wikipedia article. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

I will also note that you spun off this page into a separate article despite at least one editor objecting to you doing so. In the future, if someone objects to a content fork, you must obtain consensus before doing so. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

@Thecleanerand: I'm planning on restoring the tags if you don't respond here. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Don't lecture me on "good faith" and "personal attacks" when YOU insinuated that this entire mess was my fault ("good faith"?) despite the edit history and above discussion CLEARLY showing otherwise. I'm only at fault for the improper "cut-and-paste job". Nothing else.

"I'm planning on restoring the tags if you don't respond here."

Yeah. How about you do that (ie "Practice what you preach"), instead of making weak threats? How about you do something PRODUCTIVE on this website like every other editor, instead complaining about problems and blaming everyone else for them? While you're at it, you can get off your high horse and give me a PROPER FUCKING APOLOGY for accusing me of something I didn't do! Thecleanerand (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I apologize for stating that you spun off the page after there was an objection. I misread the discussion above and thought you spun it off after the objection was made, rather than before. Instead of blowing up at me, you could have just politely pointed out that I was wrong. Do you object to me restoring the maintenance tags? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)