Talk:Maple leaf

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Red-tailed hawk in topic "Maple leafs" listed at Redirects for discussion

Maple Leaf in Logos

edit
Putting a Maple Leaf in the logo signifies that it is a Canadian product to Canadians. It's to show Canadian pride and that the chain are as Canadian run as possible. This is like Americans putting "Made in America" right below the product name in big bold letters. It's so that people understand that the product is home grown (or whatever). It comes from peoples' dislike of other people coming in to their country and telling them what to do and how to do it. This is especially true for Canada, as a significant number of Americans view Canada as "America Jr.", and Canadians don't want them trying to impose their view and such on them. And other countries' companies used cultural icons in their logos and ads all the time. How many products in the States incorporate stars and/or strips into logos and ads? The companies that don't do this kind of thing are the one that want to create their own icon (like McDonald's Golden Arches) so that they can go international and not be significantly identified with one country so that they can spread to others.u can ifb the stars shine abmsndbsbd hyshd shwjhsjws d See internationalism. JQF 00:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oh, OK... Thought it was some kind of rule! -newkai | talk | contribs 02:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Holy Trinity

edit

According to one particular interpretation, the Maple leaf could be depicting the Holy Trinity, i.e. God as is usually understood in Christianity. See for instance the Andrei Rublev painting, which in depicted in the same shape as the maple leaf. There are various traditional symbols such as the fleurs-de-lis, the shamrock and the Christmas tree that have the same basic shape and that have historically been used to represent the Holy Trinity in art and symbol. ADM (talk) 09:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit

What's going on with the picture here? 'Leaves with myriad shapes, including some maples' isn't a great way to show people what a maple leaf looks like, especially not as the first thing you see in the article. geeoharee (talk) 16:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maple leaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Maple species

edit

Besides the stylised version(s), which species were commonly used in designs, and when/where? —DIV (120.17.54.62 (talk) 00:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC))Reply

I'm not an expert on the Canadian maple leaf emblem, but I came across this article that points out that in some cases, for instance on the 2002 $5 Coloured Silver Maple Leaf coin (which can currently be seen here), the maple leaf is rendered using the Norway maple (Acer platanoides), an invasive species not native to Canada. But the Canadian Silver Maple Leaf coin seems to show a sugar maple (Acer saccharum) leaf. — Eru·tuon 18:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maple leaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Maple leafs" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Maple leafs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 17 § Maple leafs until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply