Internet Meme is not necessary

edit

The Internet Meme section is not relevant to Marc Brown's personal or professional profile in that he did not generate it nor has it been officially associated with him. It's also arguable that the image is not even considered a Meme. It should be removed, otherwise every other Internet-based image, video, rumor for every other noted Wikipedia entry should have such a section included. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.123.31 (talk) 08:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I would argue that any time a local TV reporter is world-famous for a single photograph, humorous or not, it belongs on their Wikipedia page. CarolinianJeff (talk) 21:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

i agree Bouket (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marc Brown (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Rapist Search" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rapist Search. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –MJLTalk 22:51, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply