Several secondary sources cited: template messages should be removed

edit

I have added more references. I don't think the article relies too strongly on either a) primary sources; or b) sources closely associated to the subject. It is packed with references — including several, rich, secondary sources. Neutrality is not an issue, as the cited primary sources are simply complementing secondary sources, but aren't necessary. I have worked hard on this article, for several weeks, and believe the template messages should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pugliese23 (talkcontribs) 22:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the fixes. I have done some further polishing and have now removed the tags. Tobias2934 (talk) 23:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply