Talk:Marcus Manilius

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Astrology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

This was found on the Manilius-page:

If you are interested in Marcus Manilius, a Latin poet of the first century AD who wrote a long poem on Astrology, you can visit my site at http://manilio.f2g.net.

There you will find a comprehensive list of bibliography, links and a forum where you can post questions relating to this poet or Astrology.

Thank you very much.

Martín Pozzi (mpozzi@myrealbox.com)

[[user:JeLuF|J?

This article could be dispensed with, I think. What it says about Manilius is unnecessary in view of the Astronomica article, and what it says about Housman belongs, if anywhere, in the Housman article. Besides, it lacks citations, and is strangely written in places.Seadowns (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

As to the "bafflement" about Housman abandoning Propertius for Manilius, Housman did in fact edit Propertius, but could not get his edition published. Ms was destroyed after his death as directed by him. Seadowns (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

::More about the bafflement and Wilson's remark. People don't realise that Housman was interested in Propertius as an editorial task, not as literature, rather as Newton was interested in the gravitational pull of the planets, not their beauty in the night sky. Wilson was misguided, and his words could leave a false impression. I have altered the paragraph about Housman to take out some of the overheated writing and to try to correct the impression left by Wilson's comment. Seadowns (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Seadowns (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

What JS Phillimore did as editor illustrates the task. He went to Germany to verify the age of the oldest ms., which had been questioned, he was able to judge that the scribe had not been learned, and he took account of various marks on the ms., eg the letter q meaning obviously query, which occurs quite often. This and other work is described in his preface of 1901. It shows that Wilson did not know what he was talking about, really. Seadowns (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic