Talk:Marcus Perperna (consul 92 BC)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Labattblueboy in topic Move?
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: to move. Labattblueboy (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Marcus Perperna (consul 92 BCE) → Marcus Perperna (consul 92 BC) — Common dating qualifier, by User:Labattblueboy 21:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC), re-posted here by Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Lucius Marcius Philippus (consul 91 BCE) → Lucius Marcius Philippus (consul 91 BC)
- Lucius Gellius Publicola (consul 36 BCE) → Lucius Gellius Publicola (consul 36 BC)
- Gaius Cassius Longinus (consul 96 BCE) → Gaius Cassius Longinus (consul 96 BC)
- Support for consistency. Although WP guidelines generally have no preference between BC and BCE, virtually all other Roman consuls using a year as part of their qualifier use BC. See for example Category:1st-century BC Romans, Category:Roman censors, Category:Roman Republican consuls. Station1 (talk) 07:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.