This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article suffers from one key factor, and that is the lack of proper sourcing on claimed Maronite ancestry AND the opposing views on it. Through research online, one only finds so much. I have done my best to aid this article in conforming to Wikipedia's neutrality standards, however it is still problematic. All items are sourced as best as possible, but further research is required to ensure this article is thorough enough to be definitive. If anyone has more information (that can be sourced) then by all means add to it, however refrain from entering unsourced "opinion" based material — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.66.40 (talk) 22:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Made changes until better sources are available. This article should remain neutral, the opinion of some does not over rule that of others in this context as there are many sources claiming Maronites are the Mardaite (though I personally do not think they are). Removed the suspiciously opinionated piece of text until better sources can definitely prove one side over the other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.66.40 (talk) 09:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion
Regardless of if Mardistan = Mardiates or not, Mardistan does not mean Armenian. Mards/Mardistani were a non-Armenian people who inhabited much of eastern Anatolia, and established several dynasties ruling the area. Moreover, Mard was the classical Armenian term for Kurds (See for example). Roboskiye (talk) 20:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Neither the Dictionary of Byzantium nor the Encyclopaedia of Islam mention anything about Kurds in their lengthy dedicated entries, the "falsification" would be referencing that claim to them. The Dictionary of Byzantium speculates that they were either Armenians of Persians, the EOI on the other hand cites contemporary Arabic histories mentioning their peasants as Nabaț (i.e. Aramaeans) or Syrians. The brief Blackwell entry looks very awkward imo, first of all nowhere I can find credentials of the writer "Crane Russak", secondly "Kurd" as a 7th century Cilician ethnonym seems very anachronous, back then this term was used as a catch-all for any nomadic or semi-nomadic peoples of any religious or linguistic group.
Salvatore Cosentino's claim is also very unlikely, he first states that he is "not competent" to deal with the problem of their identity then he hypothises they were Kurds since he finds that some of them originate from Germanicia which he mistakenly locate in Marda in eastern Anatolia.--Kathovotalk14:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I, at the very begining, wrote: regardless of if Mardaite = Mardians or not. I don't care if these two are the one and the same. But what I say is that Mardian is not Armenian. Mardian, as in Greek sources, was an Iranic/Persian tribal group in Zagros/Taurus mountains. In Armenian sources it meant Kurds. In Arabic/Islamic sources it was ancestor of the Kurds. My argument in short again: Mardistan/Mards/Mardoi/Mardians were not Armenians. Roboskiye (talk) 18:20, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
How is this related to the Mardaites/Jarajima? We have several specialised references that make no such connection. Bringing a circumstantial mention of "Mard" and "Kurd" and use this to support the claim that Mardaites were Kurds follows under WP:SYNTH.
The fact is there was no clear meaning of the term Kurd back in the 7th century, Persians called Arabs Kurds, Arabs called Armenians Kurds, etc.--Kathovotalk11:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply