This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Margaret Preston is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There is a lot of good information here, but the style is horrible. It needs to be wikified, with internal links, references, section headers... And it has a bunch of possibly non-notable, sentimental information that doesn't seem very encyclopedic. Logical Gentleman (talk) 02:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The main issue appears to be that an outside website was ported into Wikipedia wholesale and with no citations on 9 August 2009, a blatant copyright violation. (Or just possibly the very long 9 August edit was later ported outwards, but it doesn't look like it because the outside website is sourced and appears to date to February 2009.) Anyway, I have worked on cleaning up the article as I agree with your general take on this. It could still use a larger number of sources, however, as right now there are really just two.Alafarge (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
