Talk:Margaret Sinclair (nun)

Why?

There appears to be nothing at all notable or remarkable about the life of the subject of this article, unless it has somehow been omitted. Apparently the only matter of note is having been declared "venerable" some decades after her death but there is no indication as to why this was done. The implication, if there is one, is that she was singled out for her ordinariness but surely there are numerous such unremarkable nuns. Can anyone shed light? Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Sinclair (nun). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.stpatricksparish.co.uk/sinclair.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061024212135/http://www.indcatholicnews.com/nsct.html to http://www.indcatholicnews.com/nsct.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Weird

[1] NoelveNoelve, what's the problem? I've primarily added sourced information on the beatification – the church always begins with the process of beatification – process of Margaret Sinclair and put a parameter of the infobox to its usual place. Furthermore, I added a reliable source and removed the misleading information that someone whose beatification process is still open is venerated in the Roman Catholic Church. (You even reset the edited caption, which only and explicitedly refers to Venerable Mary Francis of the Five Wounds.) If this will lead you to go "to conflict resolution", don't bother, I shall remove the article from my watch list, I just wonder what your behaviour supposed to mean. Medusahead (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)