Marguerite Young (journalist) is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In the lead to Marguerite Young (journalist) you seem to imply that Alger Hiss recruited someone to be a member of CPUSA. This smells like !@#$%^&*. I'd like to see documentation. I've read a lot about Hiss. Never even seen this. I intend to delete the offending clause ASAP if there's not reply. Without regards Tapered (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Tapered (talk): Challenge welcomed and accepted -- on page 161 of her own memoir, Nothing but the Truth, Marguerite Young states that she met Alger Hiss. If you read and/or search through this entry, you will see that the detailed footnotes demonstrate this and other facts asserted in this entry. --Aboudaqn (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Guess again. That she met Hiss doesn't seen worth disputing. Her word that she saw Hiss attempting to recruit for CPUSA only merits mention to the effect that she stated this assertion. It doesn't belong in the lead, in any event as it stands now, in any event. For the record, I have a tangential connection to the Hiss family, but would never allow that veer from the guidelines here. That info doesn't belong in the lead, again. Tapered (talk) 05:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
over-reliance on memoirs, and possible original research
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Aboudaqn:: This article has an inordinate amount of block quote excerpts of Young's memoir, over-citation of the memoir (WP:NPOV), and what appears to be original research and original synthesis, i.e. inferring statements not explicitly stated in sources. Lengthy verbatim dialogue, especially regarding the Alger Hiss case, is unencyclopedic (it might have a place in a book length biography, but not a concise encyclopedia), and its relevance is dubious: secondary sources that discuss Young and Hiss should be used to assess proper weight and prominence to give various aspects. Statements throughout the article like "appears to be", "presumably" and "judging by the dates of her articles..." strongly resemble original research and personal opinions. Nothing should be written in Wikipedia that isn't already published in reliable sources. The article implies the "Young" referred to by Hope Hale Davis is Marguerite Young. Is this specifically stated, or conjecture? If conjecture, it has no place in this article. There are dozens of references, but many seem to be sources written by Young, primary sources like her name in a list or passing mentions, or have no mention of Young whatsoever and so cannot verify statements about her. More secondary sources that directly discuss Young are needed. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
I see you removed speculation about her death but did not remove the part of the section heading "Personal life and death". It is very confusing as is.
