Talk:Maria Antonescu

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Recent edits

edit

To those who add citation needed tags to the lead, the info is amply sourced in the text, and verified there by at least three citations. But I suspect you already know that, and are just grasping at straws.

To those who keep adding extraneous (and exceptionally badly written) descriptions of what Ion Antonescu did, here in the lead, please don't -- it reads like an obsessive rant more than an encyclopedic entry, and the point is well driven home by what's already in the article and the lead. Dahn (talk) 05:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

And for Chrissake: she was not Ion Antonescu's "second" wife -- the "info" about a first and Jewish wife is absolute junk, not mentioned in any account of Antonescu's life so far. Please stop with this pseudo-historical garbage, especially in such a contentious issue. Dahn (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also, not matter what her crimes, she was not in fact tried by the People's Tribunals. So please stop adding counterfactual lore to the article. Dahn (talk) 11:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maria Antonescu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply