Talk:Maria Kaczyńska

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Was the First Lady?

edit

The article now says "was the First Lady of Poland from 2005 to 2010 as wife of Lech Kaczyński, the then President of Poland."

It is true that the president has died but he is still de jure president on paper and therefore I can't understand why all of you edit the article all the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.103.125 (talk) 16:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

In English, past tense is used when speaking of a person who had passed away, hence the "was". I don't understand what do you mean by the dead president "is still de jure president" when Poland now has an Acting President (and a dead person can't serve as the president anyway, unless it is in North Korea). --Joshua Say "hi" to me!What I've done? 18:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Daughter & Grandchildren

edit

An editor has decided to revert, twice now, the inclusion of her daughters name+ DoB (Marta, 1980) which has been in the article text for at least 3 years, and her granchildren's names (recent inclusion) as "The information is irrelevant and invades people's privacy" See Diff. What do other editors think? I seek concensus to include the data as:

  1. There is no guideline or policy preventing it, (that I know off)
  2. The information is from Maria Kaczyńskas' official biography page, Bio., & AFAIK, has been reported in several recent news reports.
  3. It is common Wikipedia practice to include such information in biographical articles.

Comments please? --220.101.28.25 (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Polish wikipedia seem to have the daughters' details, [1] --220.101.28.25 (talk) 20:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
The information about her daughter's name, and that of her grandchildren, is altogether unnecessary and a violation of their privacy. It should stay out. It's not enough for there to be no policy specifically prohibiting it - if you want to include it, there should be a good, specific reason why the information must be included. There is no such reason. Note that while policy does not specifically prohibit the information you want to include WP:BLP states, "The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved persons without independent notability." BLP applies everywhere - including in articles like this that aren't BLPs. UserVOBO (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
See specifically WP:BLPNAME. UserVOBO (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't see a concensus here, or any wish by you to seek it. As you are aware, another editor felt the same as me on Lech Kaczyński. I see it as 2 for inclusion, and you against. How can their privacy be violated when their names are widely reported? Including (the daughters' at least) in the pl.Wikipedia article? Which was in the article here for at least 3 years?. See also my point 3, above "common Wikipedia practice". List of articles with daughters'/ grandchildrens names:
European American Sheriff’s Advisory Council,
The Epoch Times,
Polish Newsweek,
wyborcza,
Radio Gdansk,
www.abc.es,
www.lrytas.lt,
first-lady-returns-to-poland,
marta-kaczynska-zmuszona-wyjsc-z-cienia,
Wall Street Journal PHOTO + caption 2nd from bottom
Poland mourns as president, wife lie in state
Why do you feel so strongly about this? Please explain. I hope you are assuming good faith on my part, even though I am an 'anon IP' (astatic IP too!), I am not a vandal or troll. Please check my contributions and this if you have doubts on that score.
Also remember wp:CONCENSUS--220.101.28.25 (talk) 09:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
WP:CONSENSUS does not trump WP:BLP. There is no good reason for including this information, and perfectly good reasons for keeping it out. That her name has been widely reported is neither here nor there; it doesn't affect the presumption in favor of privacy in BLP. UserVOBO (talk) 22:44, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Maria Kaczyńska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria Kaczyńska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maria Kaczyńska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply