Talk:Maria Minna

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Error:

The reference to Hon. Maria Minna, P.C., M.P., Member of Parliament for the Toronto riding of Beaches-East York, incorrectly states that:

She was expelled from the [Cabinet] position after it was discovered she had improperly voted in a municipal by-election, she was thus confined to the backbenches.

Her illegal actions were leaked from within the Liberal Party and it is generally believed that Warren Kinsella an important Liberal advisor who has long wanted to run in Minna's seat was responsible.

Fact:

In a report released on September 27, 2002, Canada’s Office of the Ethics Counsellor stated that:

“On the basis of the information gathered, the Office of the Ethics Counsellor has concluded that Maria Minna was entitled and eligible to vote in the City of Toronto Ward 31 by-election of December, 2001.

“Since she only voted once in the municipality, the provisions of the Municipal Elections Act of Ontario were respected.”

The report also included a document from the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the body responsible for preparing the preliminary voters’ list, which stated that:

“Accordingly, the Preliminary List of Electors provided to the City of Toronto for Ward 31 contained the name of Maria Minna as an eligible voter.”

In an interview on CBC Radio later that day, Federal Ethics Counsellor Howard Wilson said “there’s no question about the legitimacy of her name being on that voting list as a tenant.”

Later in that same interview, Mr. Wilson said, “in my opinion, she did nothing wrong.”

Media coverage:

Ethics watchdog exonerates Minna of voting illegally

No wrongdoing in by-election, Wilson says

Liberal MP Maria Minna received her long-awaited exoneration over charges of voting irregularities yesterday, but the former cabinet minister said she has already paid “a very dear price.”

-- Toronto Star – September 28, 2002

Liberal MP’s vote proper, official rules

The federal ethics counselor has ruled that Toronto Liberal MP Maria Minna did nothing wrong when she voted in a municipal by-election on Dec. 3.

-- Globe and Mail – September 28, 2002

Liberal MP cleared in municipal vote controversy

Maria Minna, a Liberal MP, did nothing wrong when she voted in a municipal by-election in Toronto in December, the Ethics Counsellor has ruled.

-- National Post – September 28, 2002

Background:

Prior to advance polling day for the municipal by-election in November 2000, Maria Minna’s name was on the voter’s list.

She was issued a voter’s card and she was entitled to vote.

To be absolutely sure, her staff contacted the City of Toronto Elections Services Office.

They were advised that a business tenant in Ward 31 could vote in the by-election as long as the name of the voter was on the lease, the voter was on the voters’ list and a voter’s card had been issued.

City of Toronto staff actually faxed copies of relevant legislation to her constituency office confirming the advice that they had provided.

The voters’ list prepared by the City of Toronto for the Ward 31 by-election – without any request from Maria Minna or her staff -- properly listed her name as a “non-resident tenant”.

In fact, she was but one of 1,900 voters listed as “non-resident”.

Many of those non-resident eligible voters live in the City of Toronto and voted in the Ward 31 by-election.

Maria Minna was entitled to be on the Ward 31 voters’ list.

She was properly provided with a voter’s card in accordance with the legislation.

She was entitled to vote in the Ward 31 by-election and she committed no offence by having done so.

However, one of her political opponents made false claims about her in the media about two weeks after the election.

Several months later, she was cleared of any wrongdoing.

Correction:

We would appreciate it very much if you would acknowledge the error and publish the correct information.

Sincerely yours,

Robert MacBain

Chairman Maria Minna Re-election Campaign


Thank you for your detailed comments. I have updated the article. - SimonP 20:48, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

Article needs work

edit

I am doing some revision on this article as much of the text appears to be lifted from Minna's personal website - not the greatest source. Anybody who is interested can help out. Just make sure it is properly sourced. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria Minna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Maria Minna/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
One must take umbrage with this biased article surely written by a staffer of Ms. Minna. It is at once breathless in it's praise of the woman and scandalously lacking in substance - unless one qualifies as success the spending of millions in federal tax dollars then Ms. Minna deserves the praise. She has certainly done well at spending.

When she visited my door during the last election campaign I told her I would not be voting for her or her party due to the [Sponsorship scandal], lack of an environmental program, and by the way, "You don't even live in the riding." After listening to some well-worn sound bites I thanked her for her time, quit being a Liberal supporter, and promptly joined the Green Party.

Lamentably she represents the majority of today's political species, a rich housewife who has time to spend glad-handing and writing home to the folks about how well she's done in North America. As Churchill said, "So they [the Government] go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all-powerful to be impotent."

Last edited at 15:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 23:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria Minna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply