Talk:Marie Christine Chilver
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marie Christine Chilver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
edit"Chilver, who went by her middle name of Christine " says the Telegraph article. Christine Chilver, the original name for the article, would therefore seem to be the best place for it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC).
- And the BBC says "The agent, real name Marie Chilver"[1], so why not simply take her full name? Anyway, the "original" name of the article was "Marie Chilver", not "Christine Chilver", so that part of your statement is clearly incorrect. It seems more logical that she went by Marie Chilver in "real" life, and by her middle name "Christine" when acting as "Christine Collard", but that's guesswork to explain the discrepancy between the BBC and the Telegraph. Until we have more information, using her full name seems to be the safest (and is the name used in e.g. the Independent article[2]. Fram (talk) 14:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- It may seem more logical, but it's not fact. Both the explicit statement by the Telegraph, the usage in the NA articles, the usage in Latvia and the comments by people who knew her, make it clear she went by Christine. Moreover it is standard practice in covert matters to keep, where possible, one's usual name, as one has to respond to it naturally. I have therefore moved the article per COMMONNAME. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC).
- And I reverted, per the reasons above. Please, when you know that a move is contested, use WP:RM instead of making it regardless. The usage in Latvia is not relevant for the English Wikipedia though, it is the common name in English language sources that matters here. Fram (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- It may seem more logical, but it's not fact. Both the explicit statement by the Telegraph, the usage in the NA articles, the usage in Latvia and the comments by people who knew her, make it clear she went by Christine. Moreover it is standard practice in covert matters to keep, where possible, one's usual name, as one has to respond to it naturally. I have therefore moved the article per COMMONNAME. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC).
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marie Christine Chilver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319031500/http://www.dzd.lv/new/?w=main to http://www.dzd.lv/new/?w=main&animal=1&id=540eb2d248afe&lang=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)