Talk:Marilyn Monroe portfolio
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 17 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Myrandasmithburger.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
_-_The_Great_Graphic_Boom_expo_-_Staatsgalerie_-_Stuttgart_-_Germany_2017.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
_-_The_Great_Graphic_Boom_expo_-_Staatsgalerie_-_Stuttgart_-_Germany_2017.jpg){kind=link}
Prod
editHi @The Erethizontidae: I had to remove the prod off this article. It is heavily referenced and the works are in the Tate and the Met Museums, so they likely highly notable, worthy of an article. What exactly are the reasons you want the article removed? scope_creepTalk 14:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- The article reads like a dramatic advertisement, not an encyclopedia. Many of the sources do not substantiate the claims the article makes and some of the claims feel like they should be on Warhol or Monroe's own pages (if they are accurate).
- Read the article in its entirety and then compare it to this article or this one. I think you'll see what I mean. This article is longer than the one about the Marilyn Diptych which I'm pretty sure is the more important art piece. The Erethizontidae (talk) 15:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. All that stuff at the bottom, unnecessary embellishment. I would have a go at doing a proper copyedit on it, or possible send it to Afd. If the references are bad, they should come out. Be bold. Its looks a wee bit a puff piece. scope_creepTalk 15:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- That Gerard Malanga section needs to go. Its non-specific. scope_creepTalk 15:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. All that stuff at the bottom, unnecessary embellishment. I would have a go at doing a proper copyedit on it, or possible send it to Afd. If the references are bad, they should come out. Be bold. Its looks a wee bit a puff piece. scope_creepTalk 15:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Repurposing
editFurther to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled from Marilyn Monroe, I propose converting this to an article on the whole series. Thoughts? Best title? Johnbod (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)