Talk:Marinobufagenin
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Fuhghettaboutit in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was not moved. Per below, the current title appears to be the common name of the compound.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Marinobufagenin → Marinobufagin – This article's first paragraph doesn't agree with its title! You can see the real name of the compound here, for example: [1]. See also the list at Bufagin. 86.128.241.168 relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2012 (UTC) (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Relisting comment - this RM needs expert input. Chemical project notified --Mike Cline (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Both names are used for the same substance, as far as I can tell. Google gives 12.700 results for marinobufagenin and 6.710 for marinobufagin; PubMed gives 126:12. Marinobufagenin also seems the more logical name to me as the substance is an aglycone. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Per Chemical Abstracts the two names are synonyms for the same chemical compound and a literature search shows that marinobufagenin appears to be used more often the scientific literature. I think the current title "Marinobufagenin" is acceptable, and probably preferable. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.