- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Mario Cerrito. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 09:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Mario Cerrito III. → Mario Cerrito III – To eliminate the extra period, per style guidelines. Tinton5 (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Comment Would Mario Cerrito be a better option? I clicked on the first three references in the article, and this is the name they used. 162 etc. (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support I'm sorry, I moved the name to Mario Cerrito III. and put the period by accident. I was just trying to help the article as I saw all of the references were listed as Mario Cerrito or Mario Cerrito III. After research, His verified facebook profile says Mario Cerrito III, seen here www.facebook.com/MarioCerritoIII — Preceding unsigned comment added by Summerlee44 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support uncontroversial technical request for deletion of the stray punctuation mark and furthermore also support Mario Cerrito III. → Mario Cerrito, per 162 etc. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support Mario Cerrito (although removing the period is obviously better than nothing). The sources seem to be split regarding the suffix, but removing it makes the title more concise while losing nothing in precision. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
