Talk:Mariological papal documents

Untitled

I started this article primarily as a List of All Items style article, then added some text to each item for clarification. It is not intended to be a discussion of papal Mariology, but a central list of official Vatican Marian documents, which I could not find elsewhere in Wikipedia. History2007 (talk) 04:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal

This article was the subject of a merge proposal, with marge tags placed on 20 November 2010, but concluded as "Do not merge", as discussed on Talk:Mariology of the popes. History2007 (talk) 20:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mariological papal documents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140530003451/http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/rosarymarkings29.html to http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/rosarymarkings29.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Format

I have started to list the documents in chronological order. The reason is (1) I think it better aids in following the development of thought over time; and (2) later documents frequently reference an earlier one, and someone might wish to trace them in order. The particular type is noted for each as to its relative importance, but may be less helpful in seeing what concepts were viewed as important at a particular time, and how the theological ideas developed. If anybody is bothered by this, feel free to revert. Mannanan51 (talk) 05:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)