Talk:Mariposa botnet
A fact from Mariposa botnet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Start
editThis doesn't say when the botnet was formed. When did it start? — Rlevse • Talk • 18:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Always difficult to estimate, let alone reliably source. By its nature a botnet is illegal, which means that the owners tend to prefer to keep it hidden - after all, a detected botnet can be counteracted and that is generally undesirable (For example, the creators of the Asprox botnet have been known to shrink their botnet to reduce the amount of attention it would attract). Other botnets start growing silently at first, infecting programs with trojan horses in order to spread and increase the botnets size, but taking no other overt actions that could lead to an early death. Another issue is that some trojans (Such as mariposa's) are sold to various people, which makes it difficult to differentiate between various botnets. Hence, the Kraken and Bobax botnets are suspected to be the same by various security firms.
- The botnets that do list a creation date on Botnet are generally estimates, or dates at which the first anti-virus definitions were releases. In some cases reverse engineering offers some clues as well. Even so, the "Founding" date is incredibly difficult to determine (As said - some botnets are found to be dormant for months gathering strength). This is why this article lists the discovery date - thats as accurate as it gets if you wish clear sources. Any "Creation" date would be inaccurate at best, and even more difficult to source. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Understand that but I was figuring that since they were discovered at least some rough idea of their formation had been uncovered. Yes, it's a shady area. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Sometimes there are some estimates - but in this case i couldn't really find a source that explicitly stated this as such. Another problem is that these estimates can widely vary across sources and companies, which would lead to a messy article stating multiple dates. In this particular case we might be in luck though - since the operators were arrested their testimonies might contain some documentation detailing the start date. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:56, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Understand that but I was figuring that since they were discovered at least some rough idea of their formation had been uncovered. Yes, it's a shady area. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mariposa botnet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110511115226/http://www2.canada.com/topics/technology/story.html?id=3333655 to http://www2.canada.com/topics/technology/story.html?id=3333655
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mariposa botnet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100725032024/http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201009/5330/Mariposa-botnet-12-7-million-bots-strong-knocked-offline to http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201009/5330/Mariposa-botnet-12-7-million-bots-strong-knocked-offline
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)