Talk:Maritime history of Europe

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 213.107.86.115 in topic Maritime history referencing help

WP:MILHIST Assessment

edit

A lot of work went into this, and it's obviously long enough to warrant B-class. But I wonder if it could be (or should be) expanded. I suppose it depends on the goals of the article. Are we seeking to tell a relatively simple and straightforward narrative of progress, or are we looking to actually describe in detail every major or significant event or development? If the latter, then we have quite a ways to go. Also, something has to be done about the poor formatting and crowding of the pictures. This might solve itself as each section is expanded. LordAmeth 22:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Few years down the road, the main concern is not comprehensiveness, but lack of inline references. Till they are added, the article cannot achieve B class or higher. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:19, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Maritime history of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maritime history of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Maritime history referencing help

edit

Ancient Egyptian royal ships 213.107.86.115 (talk) 17:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply