Talk:Mark Burgess (children's author)
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
A fact from Mark Burgess (children's author) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- Blue Hen Book Award 2002 for Dogs' Night Previous Blue Hen Book Award Winners
- Brief bio on Egmont UK Ltd
- JRank.org Mark Burgess Biography - Personal, Addresses, Career, Writings, Sidelights
- Review of Return to the Hundred Acre Wood The Times
Rescue discussion
editKeep. Mark Burgess is an important British illustrator, as I believe the above remarks are meant to suggest. He certainly qualifies as being notable (or a lot of other articles on illustrators and designers will have to go). Illustration is an important part of modern culture, those who excel should be mentioned in Wikipedia. The article should not be deleted. If it does not meet the other criteria of Wikipedia, than that is the issue that should be addressed. --JHvW (talk) 14:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
It seems pretty obvious to me that this article was written by this Mark Burgess himself to look more important. Does someone who wrote only two books and who is not very well known can have such a detailed article ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NoirOrchestre (talk • contribs) 09:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, Mark Burgess (User:Marcus civis) added next to nothing to the article (at least directly). I wrote around 85% of the article if you check the history. I did e-mail the author to ask him to check whether I got my facts right and got him to upload the image shown on the page, but he did not contribute any of the content; in fact, I had asked him not to edit the article due to possible conflict of interest. Moreover, I did not add anything which I could not find a source for. Anyhow, the rescue has already been completed and the AfD discussion agreed that he is notable. The article is so detailed due to rescue efforts and because I wanted to expand it 5x to make WP:DYK. —CodeHydro 14:22, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mark Burgess (children's author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/b/u/r/Bill-Burgess/WEBSITE-0001/UHP-0033.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725161611/http://www.chassociation.org/oldblues/blueyellowpages.php?mode=LetterSearch&letter=B to http://www.chassociation.org/oldblues/blueyellowpages.php?mode=LetterSearch&letter=B
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)