Talk:Mark Ciavarella
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark Ciavarella article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
plead guilty
editI thought he plead guilty only "honest services" fraud and tax fraud charges. Not to the cash for kids scam. --217.10.60.85 (talk) 10:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Kids for cash scandal
editA redirect, Kids for cash scandal, has been created as a placeholder for a new main article about the entire scandal. It currently redirects to Mark Ciavarella. I am going to attempt to throw together a couple of paragraphs to replace the redirect later this morning, any thoughts would be appreciated. Sswonk (talk) 14:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC) Article started It duplicates a few of the sentences in the Ciavarella article but that should change over time. Sswonk (talk) 16:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
I removed the paragraph that described the 2009 appeal as being based on the lack of a guilty plea. There was a guilty verdict in 2011. That would seem to remove the basis of the appeal. I was unable to find any update on any subsequent court decision as to the legitimacy of the forfeiture of pension rights although I assume Ciavarella's action contesting the forfeiture was likely dismissed. Activist (talk) 18:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
American justice !?
editCan we pay inmates at his prison to rape him?....Article states "Ciavarella has denied that there was a connection between the juvenile sentences he rendered and the kickbacks he received", due to this , his punishment was quadroupeled (I've watched a TV-documentary on this scandal) from 7 to 28 years ! Although mr Ciavarella presumably has damaged some youth in Pennsylvania, not all convicted were innocent.
- And 28 years (of which 21 are for talking about the first 7) appear to me to far far too long.
- For American society in general, might the power he had as juvenile judge been too much. And surelly more people must have been involved. I think this also clearly demonstrates why prisons (of all kind) must be owned and run by the nation, state , county or city - not private owned prisons. The same goes for police, military, large hospitals etc (Ment for libertanians) Boeing720 (talk) 06:22, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Mark Ciavarella. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://jlc.org/files/luzernecounty/ciavarella_plea.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090916052305/http://www.citizensvoice.com:80/news/disgraced_jurists_should_not_get_judicial_immunity_attorney_says to http://citizensvoice.com/news/disgraced_jurists_should_not_get_judicial_immunity_attorney_says
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120224031549/http://www.timesleader.com/news/hottopics/judges/Ciavarella_ruling_reviewed_08-07-2009.html to http://www.timesleader.com/news/hottopics/judges/Ciavarella_ruling_reviewed_08-07-2009.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Mark Ciavarella. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110220000624/http://www.timesleader.com:80/news/Deliberations-resume-in-CIavarella-trial.html to http://www.timesleader.com/news/Deliberations-resume-in-CIavarella-trial.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120224031554/http://www.timesleader.com/news/hottopics/judges/Doctor__Ciavarella_had_conflict_in_his_case_09-05-2009.html to http://www.timesleader.com/news/hottopics/judges/Doctor__Ciavarella_had_conflict_in_his_case_09-05-2009.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090501213019/http://www.timesleader.com:80/news/hottopics/judges/Ex-judge_may_net__50_000_04-11-2009.html to http://www.timesleader.com/news/hottopics/judges/Ex-judge_may_net__50_000_04-11-2009.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)