| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
untitled
editThe article has now been updated and fully referenced, except for his educational background, for which I was unable to find sources. Can anyone (the person who put that in) please cite sources for this information? Thanks Ohconfucius 02:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Seems like this page is quite biased and probably written by an ex-employee. This page is not representative of Mark Clifford at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aic09 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
This is one instance where removal of sourced material, ostensibly for WP:NPOV, seems to impinge on WP:CENSOR. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 01:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Simply a move towards less bias - as stated above, that is the problem here. The majority of the page does not need to be taken up with the overblown details of a couple of incidents within his career, (and the sole picture to explicitly relate to one of the incidents) as that really belongs - and should stay- in the blogs you cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aic09 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- I do see your point that the SCMP section is overweight on the controversy surrounding his departure. I don't entirely agree about the image, which I think is a centrepiece of the section, but I won't revert. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E
editThe only substantive third-party sourcing I'm seeing in this article is over the subeditor sackings. WP:BLP1E would appear to apply. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:06, 14 May 2012 (UTC)