This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
The article starts with a statement that "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments. This seems extraordinarily unlikely. How do we get the statement removed? Andy Denis 16:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
The article seems perfectly neutral. Per policy, there was a "disclosure" by an edit summary, the creator said "I am the corporate biographer of Shared Interest" whatever that means. David Goodman, who has excellent judgment on these matters, saw nothing wrong. And the subject died in the interim. So assuming good faith, I'm removing the tag, as you say, malfeasance seems very unlikely here. (I moved your remark) John Z (talk) 21:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
