Talk:Mark Hammett/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. A number of non-essential suggestions are given below as pointer to improve the article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is pretty good, probably an 7/10.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

I'd like to see more about his parentage, childhood and personal life. This is totally missing from the article and requires improvement. Was he ever in the media regarding his personal life?, Is he married? See Brian Urlacher for a good example of how such a section could be presented.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

The article needs updating for 2008. As he is no longer an active player it is not so serious that the article might be delisted at this stage, but nevertheless it has to be kept up to date.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail: