Talk:Mark Kozelek

Scored Last Ball

Would it be alright to add that he score the 2001 movie Last ball? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212298/

According to the imdb, Kozelek was born in 1967. As a high school classmate of his, I believe this is more accurate than the 1969 listed here, as I don't think he was 2 or 3 years younger than the other students in his class. Since 1967 is documented, and it agrees with my personal memory, I'm changing the listed date of birth from '69 to '67.

"obsessed" does not seem to be an objective word -- suggest changing to "highly focused on"

SALVADOR SAAAAANCHEZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.93.110 (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Kozelek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080423224337/http://www.sadreminders.com/interaction/viewtopic.php?id=1744&action=new to http://www.sadreminders.com/interaction/viewtopic.php?id=1744&action=new
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131014125832/http://welcometoflavorcountry.com/2013/05/13/an-interview-with-mark-kozelek/ to http://welcometoflavorcountry.com/2013/05/13/an-interview-with-mark-kozelek

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Controversies section

@209.151.250.145: The controversies section is well-developed and supported by reliable sources and does not constitute "false and defamatory material". If you wish to object, discuss it on this talk page. And do not make legal threats on Wikipedia as you did here. Οἶδα (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

the so called controversies section of this article is ridiculous. questionable sources, no legal relevance, no relevance whatsoever. wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a log book in which self-proclaimed moral guardians and denunciators create detailed lists of micro-transgressions for each biography. wikipedia also does not serve to defame living people on the basis of daily changing catalogs of micro-aggressions that are circulating in some echo chambers. an enzyclopedia does not serve to archive non-verifiable transcripts of conversations that are held on the sidelines of some concerts or discussions at the supermarket checkout. abuse of online encyclopedia by internet trolls is progressing rapidly, this development is worrying. Oawi77 (talk) 05:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)