 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Merlis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015085834/http://www.glbtq.com/literature/merlis_m.html to http://www.glbtq.com/literature/merlis_m.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130924004038/http://markmerlis.com/index.htm to http://www.markmerlis.com/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Death
editMark's husband and friends are posting on social media that Mark has died. We will add this fact and the dates and details to his article as soon as there is a published source that is considered a Reliable Source by Wikipedia guidelines. This is not meant as any slight to Mark or to any of Mark's loved ones; only that, as an encyclopedia, we have to make sure all content can be double-checked for accuracy in third-party, published sources. It's just the way the encyclopedia is structured. If you have a source and can't edit the article, please post it here and one of us will add it to the article. Condolences to all of Mark's loved ones, and thank you for your patience. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, in the case of a person whose notability has already been properly demonstrated by existing sources, even just his basic death notice in a newspaper's classifieds section, or on legacy.com or another obituary aggregator, would be a perfectly satisfactory source for his death. This doesn't need to be complicated at all — it just needs to be properly supported by a legitimate source. Bearcat (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)