Talk:Mark Shand

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 2001:8003:A070:7F00:5909:1FC0:2D63:F906 in topic Referring to his sister Camilla

Ancestry

edit

I removed the ancestry section but it has been challenged, Shand's ancestry has no relevance to why he has a page as a writer and conservationist, it has no encyclopedic value or relevance to the subject, all that is needed is already in family, ediucation and marriage. Note that wikipedia is not a geneological website and only includes information directly relevant to the subject. Propose the ancestry section is removed again as not relevant or needed, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Shand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Shand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Shand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Shand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Referring to his sister Camilla

edit

Setting aside the still thorny but hopefully soon-to-be-resolved issue) of whether Camilla should be called queen or queen consort (please don't focus on that issue here), we have another issue on this page: how should we refer to Camilla in this article. Should we refer to her as Camilla Parker-Bowles (which is how she was most commonly referred to in reliable sources for most of her brother's lifetime), as Duchess of Cornwall (which is how she was known at the time of his death), or as Queen? Rosbif73 (talk) 06:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I guess a better way would be to say “brother of Camilla Parker Bowles, the future Queen Camilla,” like in the article for John Bowes-Lyon. AKTC3 (talk) 06:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I would recommend using her current title, Queen Camilla. Why beat around the bush. GandalfXLD (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Equally interesting is the mentioning of Shand being a godfather to one of Jemima Goldsmith's sons. Their father is Imran Khan, a muslim and Jemima is Jewish (part of the Rothschilds as far as I know). Do they have godfathers? I think it looks like an oddity that should be explained. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:5909:1FC0:2D63:F906 (talk) 04:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply