Talk:Mark Williams (politician)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This article reads like material pasted from a campaign website. While there may not be copyright issues associated with that, it still creates NPOV issues. --BillC 00:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Significant edits

edit

I removed some material from the article. There were three reasons for this:

  1. Some of its content had been vandalised.
  2. There was material not relevant to its subject, for example biographical details of his wife. If she is a notable enough individual to have this level of detail, then the proper place for it is in an article about her. If she is not notable enough, then a biographical article on Mark Williams is likely to require only a brief mention of her.
  3. Much of the text, as had been noted earlier, seemed to have been copied from Williams' and the LiDems' websites. This had created POV (and copyright) problems for the article. A biographical article on any individual should conform to Wikipedia's NPOV policy.

If you disagree with this, please discuss it here in the article talk page. Finally, I do recommend you create a WP account. Changes made by known editors carry a lot more weight than those made anonymously. Regards, --BillC 21:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

-the info is at www.markwilliams.org.uk . It is copywrite free.

Thank you for replying. This addresses the issue of copyright. However, one point remains: Does the material conform to neutral point of view? This is important. Material taken from a politician's website, no matter its copyright status, is unlikely to be free of bias: it is, in effect, a form of advertisement. The maintenance of neutrality is important for WIkipedia. (Incidently, if you type four tildes ~~~~ after your text on talk pages, it signs and timestamps your edits, which is useful). --BillC 21:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted this back to the last "non-biased" state it was in. We don't need to know about what Mark Williams enjoys in his spare time, it's just the kind of unnecessary thing that's put on campaign leaflets to make politicians seem more human. Trystan Morris-Davies 22:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lack of Welsh speaking

edit

Er, are you sure about that statement that he's a non Welsh speaker? I'm sure I've heard him speak Welsh on S4C in the past. Harry Hayfield 15:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've heard him read out statements in Welsh, but he is not able to converse freely in Welsh, which is the usual definition of a Welsh-speaker. Lord Tonypandy would read out carefully prepared statements in Welsh on the Welsh news when he was Welsh Secretary, but he was most certainly not a Welsh-speaker.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.66.232 (talk) 12:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
The Welsh Liberal website says "Welsh learner", rather than speaker. — BillC talk 19:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recent Vandalism

edit

I've just reverted the recent vandalism that was done to this page. Please keep an eye out just in case someone tries this again! - Greg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.138.16 (talk) 16:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Williams (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply