 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus = no move. JPG-GR (talk) 06:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Marquette Building → Marquette Building (disambiguation) — Based on the article traffic tool, Marquette Building (Chicago) should be at Marquette Building. —TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 14:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support based on tool above.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 14:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Other nominations based on this tool indicate that it gives no relevant evidence in terms of Wikipedia:naming conventions. Andrewa (talk) 23:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment What do naming conventions have to do with what people are actually trying to view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs)
- Naming conventions are the policies and guidelines we use to decide what to name articles, and an article name is what is under discussion here. Andrewa (talk) 08:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment What do naming conventions have to do with what people are actually trying to view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs)
- Oppose Marquette Building (Chicago) does not get the 90% of views that are generally required to make it the primary subject. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 18:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose, for now. Using wikipedia page views to determine primary topic is problematically solipsistic. At the very least there needs to be a wider discussion about the appropriateness of using the tool for that purpose. older ≠ wiser 19:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 14:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
See Wikipedia talk:Web statistics tool for some discussion of the statistics tool. Andrewa (talk) 02:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.