Talk:Marriage Charter of Empress Theophanu

Marriage Charter of Empress Theophanu has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 9, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 28, 2014.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Marriage Charter of Empress Theophanu gave the Byzantine princess Theophanu joint imperial authority with Holy Roman Emperor Otto II?

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Byzantine

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago13 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marriage Charter of Empress Theophanu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 21:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
Prose is fine, well-written. No copyvios. I did find a Wikipedia mirror, but nothing where Wikipedia stole from another source.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Follows appropriate layout, within MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
Consistent reference format, citations have enough information.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Adequately cited. Offline sources and the French source accepted offline. I'm not fluent yet in German, but I know enough to confirm the two sources which I can access online.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

C. No original research:
All content is verifiable and attributable to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
All major aspects are dealt with.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

B. Focused:
Stays focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Fair representation, neutral, no bias.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Stable, no edit warring.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Image is in the public domain.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
An image of the marriage charter is provided, and it is so very beautiful!--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Overall: Passed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Pass or Fail:

Add topic