Talk:Mars Black (pigment)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mars Black (pigment) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mars Black (pigment). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720114307/http://www.tucsonaz.gov/arthazards/paint1.html to http://www.tucsonaz.gov/arthazards/paint1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Redirects, hatnotes, mergers. A somewhat orphaned page
editI would suggest either a merger with Iron(II,III)_oxide, or a hatnote from there to here.
was going to add a "for its use as a pigment, see Mars Black" hatnote to Iron(II,III)_oxide, but since there's not really all that much here, I think a merger might be better.
Black Iron Oxide is a generic term so I think that redirect should point to the page for the oxide in general.
I'm not sure whether a merger into a subsection, or a "for its use as a pigment see" hatnote is better, I'll leave that for others to decide. Tomatoswoop (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)