Talk:Mars Design Reference Mission

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Draft

edit

I have begun a draft variant of this based upon the existing 3.0 article to incorporate the manned Mars mission Design Reference documents. Help is welcomed.

The Draft can be found as NASA Design Reference (Mars)

Note that NASA's "Design Reference" are not limited to manned Mars Missions, and the current version 5.0 is not entitled a Design Reference Mission but Design Reference Architecture (DRA). DRMs and DRAs exist for non-manned mission, for example, a DRM exists for Venus exploration.--cregil (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC) Why is this hidden? There is no Article online right now.--78.53.71.164 (talk) 18:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, since there can be design reference missions for many different missions, this should be renamed "Mars Design Reference Mission". Geoffrey.landis (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moved to a single page on the NASA DRM

edit

I have now consolidated the page to a single article on the NASA Design Reference missions; added the dates and citations, so the flow of the process is understandable, and added some quotes explaining what the purpose of the DRM process is.

It would be good here to start adding details of what is actually in the mission plans-- but I'm out of time right now, so won't be doing this. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 13:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mars Design Reference Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mars Design Reference Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply