Talk:Marshall Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics
Marshall Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 7, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Marshall Islands, Montenegro, and Tuvalu will all be making their first Olympic appearance at the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Marshall Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
Done --Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Last thing, the following sentence does not appear to be supported by its citation: The Marshall Islands created its National Olympic Committee in 2001, and gained International Olympic Committee recognition in 2007 during the IOC's meeting on February 12, 2007.
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
- @Kees08: Done ready for you to review again. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kees08: should be good now. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:17, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kees08: Ready for ya again. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kees08: Done again --Cameron11598 (Talk) 21:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kees08: Done, re-worded that sentence (corrected the information) and it should be good to go now. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 17:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kees08: Done again --Cameron11598 (Talk) 21:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kees08: Ready for ya again. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kees08: should be good now. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:17, 3 March 2017 (UTC)