 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Marshall Wace be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Prod removed
editNot that the article is perfect but the claim that this article does not assert notability is absurd. The first sentence of the article is "Marshall Wace is among the most powerful hedge funds in the City of London with an estimated $11.5 billion under management ". If that's not an assertion of notability, I don't know what is and references should be easy to find. Pascal.Tesson 05:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Needs a revamp
editIt is pretty much a rewrite of the Guardian article it sometimes quotes. Can anyone provide more info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.179.19 (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- A History section would be nice. When was it founded? etc... 141.228.106.150 (talk) 13:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
GaveKal tie-up ended
editAt the end of April 2013. Needs updating. 218.103.114.186 (talk) 03:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Npov
editMost of the references are either old, outdated, or do not feel very neutral (investment methodology). Some references in that chapter refer simply to the website of the company, and seem to have been written by the company itself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cederik (talk • contribs) 08:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I tried to improve the article and to make it much more neutral. I added several sources and removed unnecessary words and facts which look like advertising. I decided not to remove other sources because I don't suppose they can harm the article's importance and tone.