Talk:Martin Crandall
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Removal of material
editWhy was mention of his assault charges removed? It had reputable sources cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.25.203 (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Why does Knitwits keep changing it to remove the part about the assault. Events widely known and published in the media with first-hand sources need to be left as they are an important part of a biography. If you are a fan of the artist or the band, that doesn't give you the right to remove negative facts about the person. If Knitwits keeps changing this back, I'm going to seek a third opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.90.155.55 (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Third opinion
editI've warned Knitwits (talk · contribs) about the removal. While the information should be included here, I wish that there was more information on Crandall. The inclusion of the information puts in a little too much WP:UNDUE weight on the issue. I'd advise both of you to try to add more to the page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)