Talk:Martin Crane (bishop)
(Redirected from Talk:Martin Crane (Roman Catholic bishop))
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Favonian in topic Move?
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Martin Crane (Roman Catholic bishop)Martin Crane (disambiguation) → Martin Crane- Martin Crane → Martin Crane (Frasier)
– The Roman Catholic bishop is a real person and deserves to be a primary topic. The fictional character of Frasier... I don't know, but there should be more 'Martin Crane's out there. Also, article of fictional character is a mere violation of WP:PLOT, as there is no or insufficient real-world coverage. George Ho (talk) 22:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Now that I created a disambiguation page, maybe there is no need to make a bishop a primary topic? --George Ho (talk) 22:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- On the disambiguation page, the fictional characters rank above the real people. Surely, the fictional characters should be placed below. For example, see Jack Frost (disambiguation). Rangasyd (talk) 12:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Done --George Ho (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose; the bishop is wholly unremarkable as bishops go and is linked from only 5 articles. I don't see any credible claim for that subject to be on par with the fictional character. Powers T 14:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have changed proposals. Instead of bishop, the target is disambiguation page. --George Ho (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I am aware of that. To justify sending all readers to the disambiguation page requires us to make a claim that the bishop is about as likely to be sought as the character. I don't find such a claim at all credible, at least not without some sort of numbers to back it up. Powers T 00:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have changed proposals. Instead of bishop, the target is disambiguation page. --George Ho (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.