This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Martin Crane (bishop) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Martin Crane (bishop) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
– The Roman Catholic bishop is a real person and deserves to be a primary topic. The fictional character of Frasier... I don't know, but there should be more 'Martin Crane's out there. Also, article of fictional character is a mere violation of WP:PLOT, as there is no or insufficient real-world coverage. George Ho (talk) 22:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Now that I created a disambiguation page, maybe there is no need to make a bishop a primary topic? --George Ho (talk) 22:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oppose; the bishop is wholly unremarkable as bishops go and is linked from only 5 articles. I don't see any credible claim for that subject to be on par with the fictional character. PowersT14:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I am aware of that. To justify sending all readers to the disambiguation page requires us to make a claim that the bishop is about as likely to be sought as the character. I don't find such a claim at all credible, at least not without some sort of numbers to back it up. PowersT00:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.